inHEART vs NerveWindow
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
inHEART compared with NerveWindow
| Detail |
inHEART |
NerveWindow |
| What it does | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2017
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | FR
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Contact for pricing
| Paid
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| $27 USD one-time lifetime access. Pro tier: $67 USD one-time lifetime access. 30-day money-back guarantee.
|
|---|
| Key features | - 3D cardiac model generation from CT and MR images
- Anatomical tissue and structural visualization
- Pre-procedure planning capabilities
- Integration with electroanatomic mapping systems
- Online platform for image sharing
| - State check-in to identify current nervous system state
- 23 state-matched reset routines
- Breathing, movement, grounding, sensory and cognitive reset practices
- Before and after regulation score tracking
- Quick Mode for faster sessions after 5 uses
- Sol AI assistant for talking through your state
- Pro section with 21 Pro exercises for daily training
- 16-question starting assessment setup
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - 60% reduction in procedure time
- 38% reduction in recurrence rates
- 7500+ supported cases across 40+ countries
- Proprietary segmentation algorithm for precise tissue analysis
| - State-matched practices instead of giving everyone the same exercise
- One-time $27 payment with no subscription model
- 7-minute sessions with Quick Mode down to 3-5 minutes
- Built on 61 peer-reviewed studies
- 30-day money-back guarantee with no questions
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 40 ● no change since last check | 31 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 2 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 30 | 8 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 110 | 5 |
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to inHEART More alternatives to NerveWindow