inHEART vs Hilo
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
inHEART compared with Hilo
| Detail | 
inHEART | 
Hilo |
|---|
| What it does | Not given
| Clinically validated 24/7 cuffless blood pressure monitoring
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | 2017
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | FR
| CH
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Contact for pricing
| Paid
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - 3D cardiac model generation from CT and MR images
- Anatomical tissue and structural visualization
- Pre-procedure planning capabilities
- Integration with electroanatomic mapping systems
- Online platform for image sharing
| - Continuous monitoring without cuff throughout day and night
- Approximately 25 readings per day automatically
- Weekly and monthly blood pressure averages
- Doctor-ready report generation
- Time spent within target range tracking
- CE Class IIa medical device certification
- ISO 81060-2 clinical validation
- IP68 water-resistant band
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - 60% reduction in procedure time
- 38% reduction in recurrence rates
- 7500+ supported cases across 40+ countries
- Proprietary segmentation algorithm for precise tissue analysis
| - Only clinically certified cuffless and continuous blood pressure monitoring solution
- Proven to reduce high blood pressure by up to 7 mmHg in 6 months
- 20+ years of scientific development and research foundation
- Comfortable continuous wear without manual input or reminders
- Reveals patterns traditional cuff measurements cannot detect
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 40 ● no change since last check | 48 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 9 | 30 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 30 | 36 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 110 | 390 |
|---|
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to inHEART More alternatives to Hilo