Hilo vs Navina
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Hilo compared with Navina
| Detail | 
Hilo | 
Navina |
|---|
| What it does | Clinically validated 24/7 cuffless blood pressure monitoring
| AI copilot for value-based care that helps clinicians improve HCC accuracy, close care gaps, and reduce documentation burden
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| Established
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| 2019
|
|---|
| Based in | CH
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Paid
| Contact for pricing
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Continuous monitoring without cuff throughout day and night
- Approximately 25 readings per day automatically
- Weekly and monthly blood pressure averages
- Doctor-ready report generation
- Time spent within target range tracking
- CE Class IIa medical device certification
- ISO 81060-2 clinical validation
- IP68 water-resistant band
| - AI-powered HCC recommendations at the point of care
- Clinical evidence backing for every insight
- Seamless EHR integration
- Ambient transcription and chart review support
- Care gap identification and quality management
- Multi-source data reconciliation
- Analytics and performance tracking
- 600+ AI algorithms
- Clinician-first interface design
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Only clinically certified cuffless and continuous blood pressure monitoring solution
- Proven to reduce high blood pressure by up to 7 mmHg in 6 months
- 20+ years of scientific development and research foundation
- Comfortable continuous wear without manual input or reminders
- Reveals patterns traditional cuff measurements cannot detect
| - Best in KLAS 2025 for Clinician Digital Workflow
- Explainable AI with clinical evidence backing every recommendation
- Seamless EHR integration enabling rapid clinician adoption
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 48 ▲ +1 (up) since last check | 41 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 30 | 17 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 36 | 36 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 390 | 395 |
|---|
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Hilo More alternatives to Navina